A Phil-for-an-ill Blog

March 1, 2010

Bill Gates Admits Vaccines Are Used for Human Depopulationx

Bill Gates Admits Vaccines Are Used for Human Depopulation

In the video above are two short excerpts from a recently filmed TED presentation (Feb 2010) by none other than Bill “Microsoft” Gates.
At the heart of Gates’ address lies the central Global Warming dogma, which dictates that Co2 emitted by human beings are the primary culprit for the unwanted heating of the globe. Since this artificial alleged human-induced heating effect allegedly stands to devastate the planet if left unabated, Global Warming dogma proponents therefore argue that human Co2 emissions must be drastically reduced. As Gates casually addresses the issue, he goes on to state that one way to accomplish this goal is to reduce the global human population.

ERRATUM: To be completely fair and accurate, I should have stated that Gates seeks to reduce the anticipated growth of the human population rather than that he seeks to reduce the current population. I admit that the latter slogan, that is contained in the video, is a bit misleading and I do not want to insinuate that Gates seeks to kill off currently living people. He rather seeks to lower the projected population growth.

He postulates the central equation, giving an estimation of the humanly emitted C02 load per year, to be:

Co2 = P times S times E times C

Where P stands for the population number, S the average number of services per person, E the average amount of energy units per service, and C the average Co2 emitted load per unit of service, per year; Co2 stands for the projected total humanly emitted carbon-dioxide load by the entire population per year.

In the first clip you will hear him state in plain language that he considers VACCINES to be desirable to bring down the future population number P and so reduce Co2. You will also casually hear him promoting HEALTH CARE and REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES, to accomplish that same C02 reducing goal.

Here are Bill Gates’ verbatim words [square parentheses additions for clarification purposes are mine though]:
“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that [number of 9 billion] by perhaps 10 or 15 percent [translates to 0.9 – 1.3 billion people]. But there we see an increase of about 1.3 [billion] [prospected global pop. growth = 9 – 6.8 = 2.2 billion; “corrected” growth due to intervention by V/HC/RHS = 2.2 – 0.9 = 1.3 billion].”

Let’s focus on the vaccines. Gates is stating that  he considers vaccines to be useful in contributing to bring the projected population growth of 2.2 billion down to 1.3 billion, roughly one billion. What kind of properties can thus reasonably be deduced that vaccines are to have according to Gates? Well, basically all the properties that impede people to either have children, or successfully rear them. In other words, Gates implicitly advocates the definition of his favorite kind of vaccine to be one that fosters infertility, sterility and (early onset) senility (autism) alike. Note that Gates does not mention a word on the much touted purported intention of vaccines: to offer protection against relevant diseases and therefore as such, precisely prolong life. Given the abundance of toxins in vaccines (see here, here or my H1H1 blog), the position that vaccines contribute to decrease mortality rates, is kind of hard to maintain.

So Gates proves to be quite the humanitarian there huh?

In the second excerpt you hear Gates explain what he considers to be the single most important thing that he would choose to see become a reality in the future time span of 50 years. He again confirms his “love” for the vaccine.

Download Video:
http://www.mediafire.com/?mdyftvyghyo
Youtube Link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WQtRI7A064
Sources:
http://www.autismtodayonline.com/2010/autism/bill-gates-s…
http://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates.html
Source Video on Youtube: Bill Gates on energy: Innovating to zero!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaF-fq2Zn7I

Also see Alex Jones’ and Paul Joseph Watson’s covering:

Bill Gates: Use Vaccines To Lower Population

Disclaimer:

I do not support the fossil fuel engine at the expense of clean and less polluting alternative energy sources. I do, as a matter of fact, prefer good and clean alternative energy sources over the polluting fossil fuel engine. What I have difficulty with is the eugenicist reason why they are being pushed. I do not support in any way whatsoever, the fraud called man-made or anthropogenic Global Warming.

6 Comments »

  1. hm really not surprised, informative article, thanks!

    Comment by john candy — September 11, 2010 @ 6:29 am | Reply

  2. Interesting Post, highly informative at the least. Keep up your good work bro/lad. hehe Much Love

    Comment by Spring Naki — September 13, 2010 @ 5:56 pm | Reply

  3. This is ridiculous. Vaccines = longer lives = people having less children. That’s why vaccines reduce population growth.This is a well known, well documented fact. Don’t listen to this propaganda.

    Comment by Truthteller — July 30, 2011 @ 8:43 pm | Reply

  4. The idea is that as the health of parents gets better the less children they choose to have. Poor people have many children so as to have one or more survive to take care of them in their later years.
    Of course this is debatable because as people become more healthy they live longer and that has an effect on the long term population as well.

    The equation still stands as it is. We need to reduce the CO2 gases to maintain our atmosphere that protects us from the suns more harmful rays.

    Comment by Don Moody — December 16, 2011 @ 11:04 pm | Reply

    • “The idea is that as the health of parents gets better the less children they choose to have. Poor people have many children so as to have one or more survive to take care of them in their later years.”

      Suppose that’s true then what’s the effective difference of a family that has a few children that live long, compared to another family that has many children that live short? For example, if you have a family that has one child that lives to be 80 then this is effectively (in lifespan) the same as having four children whose average age gets to be 20.

      “The equation still stands as it is. We need to reduce the CO2 gases to maintain our atmosphere that protects us from the suns more harmful rays.”

      That statement is predicated on the actual validity of the science touting the claim that man-made CO2 emissions cause climate change. If the science is really hokum then that dog also don’t hunt.

      Comment by Phil — December 18, 2011 @ 9:14 pm | Reply

  5. “That statement is predicated on the actual validity of the science touting the claim that man-made CO2 emissions cause climate change. If the science is really hokum then that dog also don’t hunt.”

    What’s the problem with erring on the side of caution? It will be our children that must deal with the consequences should we be wrong and climate change IS caused by man or is actually man made.

    I don’t understand complaining about the science. I would understand actually sorting out the science so we were sure, and, until then I am one that believes in erring on the side of caution.

    It’s not like the fossil fuels are going anywhere or are going to spoil should we choose to slow down on extracting them from the earth.

    Comment by Don Moody — December 19, 2011 @ 12:23 am | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: