When you see a night illumined by an unknown light*, know that this is the great sign given you by God that he is about to punish the world for its crimes, by means of war, famine, and persecutions of the Church and of the Holy Father. To prevent this, I shall come to ask for the consecration of Russia to my Immaculate Heart, and the Communion of reparation on the First Saturdays. If my requests are heeded, Russia will be converted, and there will be peace; if not, she will spread her errors throughout the world, causing wars and persecutions of the Church. The good will be martyred; the Holy Father will have much to suffer; various nations will be annihilated. In the end, my Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to me, and she shall be converted, and a period of peace will be granted to the world.[6] Excerpt from the Second Secret of Fatima (Wikipedia)
This appendix renders some of the available evidence on the secretive relationship between the Catholic Church, and its Jesuit Order in particular, and the birth and subsequent development of Communism, Soviet Communism in particular.
The Jesuits Perfected Communism in the Paraguayan “Reductions” of the
17th and 18th Century
(top)
It is ironic that the ostensibly much dreaded arch-enemy of the Roman Church is at its practical core a Jesuitical invention. Indeed, communism was perfected by the Jesuits in the Paraguayan reductions of the 17th and 18th century.
The Jesuit Reductions were a particular version of the general Catholic strategy used in the 17th and 18th centuries of building reductions (reducciones de indios), in order to Christianize the indigenous populations of the Americas more efficiently. The reductions were created by the Catholic order of the Jesuits in South America, in areas inhabited by the Tupi–Guarani peoples, which generally corresponds to modern day Paraguay. Later reductions were extended into the areas that correspond to Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia and Uruguay. |
In these regions the Jesuit reductions were different from the reductions in other regions, because the Indians were expected to adopt Christianity but not European culture.[1] Under the Jesuit leadership of the Indians through native “puppet” caciques, the reductions achieved a high degree of autonomy within the Spanish and Portuguese colonial empires. With the use of Indian labour, the reductions became economically successful. When their existence was threatened by the incursions of Bandeirante slave traders, Indian militia were created that fought effectively against the colonists.[1] The resistance by the Jesuit reductions to slave raids, as well as their high degree of autonomy and economic success, have been cited as contributing factors to the expulsion of the Jesuits from the Americas in 1767.[2] The Jesuit reductions present a controversial chapter of the evangelisational history of the Americas, and are variously described as jungle utopias or as theocratic regimes of terror.[1] Jesuit Reductions (Wikipedia) |
Here is an excerpt from The Revolutionary Movement – A Diagnosis of World Disorders by J. Findlater (1933) which lifts the veil on the nature of the Jesuit-run Communistic Reductions:
![]() |
![]() |
---|
Alternatively to the hardcopy, A pdf copy of the Findlater book can be downloaded, free-of-charge, from mediafire here.

Location of the most important reductions in Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay, with present political divisions. (Wikipedia)
Another historian, Giovanni Battista Nicolini, although slightly apologetic at times of the Jesuits, writes in his History of the Jesuits (1854):
When once the Jesuits had raised up a generation so devoted and obedient, they then brought into operation their system of government, and made a successful attempt to realise that republic preconceived of old by Plato, and which, with perhaps more interested views is held out to us by the Socialists of our own day. In fact, their form of a republic was nothing else than that Communism which the famous Cabet is now trying to establish in nearly the same regions; the only difference being, that the Jesuits substituted themselves for the state or community. Nicolini – History of the Jesuits (p. 302) |
Here is more evidence as to the Jesuitical communistic exploits of the Paraguayan reductions:
Starting in the 1600s, the Jesuits created a communist regime in Paraguay that eventually brought the Jesuits demise in the 1700s. |
The Jesuits, as is well known, held very large regions of Paraguay under missionary control from 1650 to 1750. More than a quarter million natives worked under their direction, and no payment was made directly to them…. They were educated, trained, housed, clothed, fed and, to some extent, amused, but what became of the surplus profits of their labours, and of the extensive trading that was carried on? Over two thousand boats are said to have been engaged in carrying merchandise and goods on the Parana River; and the economic value of the Reductions was beyond doubt very great: so great in deed as to have awakened the envy of Spanish and Portuguese traders. Robertson [contemporary historian] estimated that the reductions represented at least $25,000,000 capital for the Society. – Boyd Barrett, The Jesuit Enigma, New York: Boni & Liveright, p. 211. |
The Reductions were communist communes set up as manufacturing facilities using the Guarani Indians as slave laborers. The products they produced were sold in Europe and greatly enriched the Jesuit order. Bill Hughes, The Enemy Unmasked, chapter 3 |
The so-called sixth section of the book consists of a sketch of the Jesuit mission settlements in Paraguay, by M. Paul Lafargue. The Jesuit “Republic” of Paraguay has often been vaunted as a model of benevolent despotic Communism. According to Mr. Lafargue it was, on the contrary:
[E. Belfort Bax] The Forerunners of Modern Socialism (30 December 1895) |
The discovery of America by Columbus in 1492 was of profound significance. He sailed under the sign of the red cross, the sign of the Templars. After the discovery, the Pope laid claim to the Americas as his own, and divided them between Spain and Portugal. The Church of Rome and in particular the Jesuits had enormous influence all over Central and Southern America in the following 200 to 300 years. The Jesuits founded their model society in Paraguay, based on the Communist principles of Plato. The parallel between the Jesuits’ Communist state of Paraguay in the 17th century and the New World Order of the occult societies is remarkable. |
The superiority of Rome declined in Central and Southern America during the 18th & 19th centuries, as revolutions occurred that gave birth to countries we know today.THE OCCULT AND WORLD REVOLUTION |
Revisionist historian Eric Jon Phelps further clarifies the communist nature of the Reductions:
Martin: The relationship between Communism and Freemasonry. Where do the Jesuits fit into Communism and Freemasonry?Phelps: Let’s, first of all, look at the relationship of Jesuitism to Communism. The Jesuits perfected the tenets of Communism on their reductions in Paraguay, for 150 years, from 1600-1750. |
Martin: What is a reduction?Phelps: A reduction is a commune. In Israel they would call it a kibbutz. In Joseph Stalin’s Russia they would call it a commune. In New York they call it a village. In France, Paris, they called it a commune. It’s communal living where everybody is equal in their finances, in the labors; you have no great, no small, no rich, no poor—everybody is small, and everybody is poor, and everybody is controlled by a dictator. That’s the essence of Communism. |
The Jesuits, on the reductions in Paraguay, which were the communes, had a central bank, and it was “each according to their ability and each according to their need”. And so, the Guarani Indians that were the subjects—and there were some 200,000 of these South American Indian natives who were slaves of the Jesuits, putting their goods into world commerce and trade. They were living under the tenets of Communism, perfected by the Jesuits, as outlined in Plato’s Republic and Sir Thomas Moore’s Utopia. The Jesuits perfected it on their reductions. |
With that, they then introduced Communism in 1848 through Karl Marx. They tutored him in the British Museum, according to Alberto Rivera, an ex-Jesuit. |
So Marx, the Jewish Freemason, was to be the one to put forward this Communism for the world, so that Communism would look like a Jewish brain-child, so that Communism could be blamed on the Jews. Well, what’s NOT told is that the Jews involved in the implementing of Communism were Masonic Jews. Karl Marx was a 33rd-degree Freemason, a worshipper of Lucifer, whose father wanted nothing to do with him, because his father was a Baptist preacher. |
Jewish Freemasonry, controlled by the Jesuits, implemented Communism in Russia. Lenin, the half-Jew, was a Freemason. That civil war that took place from 1917-1922, for 5 years, was given the appearance that it was primarily Yiddish. I mean, they’re on the streets of Russia talking Yiddish; they had Yiddish signs; and it was wanted to give the impression to the world that this revolution was of Jewish origin. |
For 10 years after the revolution, the Jews faired very well, but in 1922, Joseph Stalin, that great Jew-hater, who was educated by Jesuits in Georgia—which was a country south of Russia and, therefore, the Emperor’s banning of the Jesuits from Russia, his Ukase, made him Secretary of the Communist Party in 1922, until he died in 1953. |
The Jesuits used Freemasonry and, of course, Stalin was also a brother Freemason. They used Freemasonry to implement Communism in Russia, and from there, China, and from there, throughout the world. bibliotecapleyades.net |
The Jesuits and the Russian Revolution
(top)
Why were the Jesuits so interested in Russia? Russia was the home of the Orthodox Christian Church, considered an arch-enemy of Rome that refused to bow down to Popery. The installation of a godless communist regime, hostile and intolerant towards religion, could function as a launching pad for the destruction of the Orthodox Church.
Jack Chick, on the basis of the revelations made by the late Jesuit renegade Alberto Rivera, explains in The Godfathers:
With respect to overthrowing the Romanov dynasty and establishing Communist rule, Karl Marx and Rasputin were given a special purpose by the Jesuit Order:
The reason why the Jesuits were so comfortable with Russia, is explained in this quote:
“The Jesuits [in the 1920s] looked after the Russian youths [in Paris] in gratitude to the Empress Catherine II who, when Pope Clement XIV dissolved the Society of Jesus in 1775 [1773] and every country in Europe, even Spain, expelled its members, gave the Jesuits asylum in Russia. Many of the Russian boys became Roman Catholics and even priests to form a band of missionaries to accompany the armies which some day, they fervently believed, would lead them back to Mother Russia to convert the Slavs from Pravoslavnaya to Roman Catholicism.” {8} [Emphasis added] Pierre van Paassen, 1964; Dutch Reformed Journalist To Number Our Days, quoted in Eric Jon Phelps’ – Vatican Assassins III (page 774) |
A little further in the same book, we read on the cooperation between Soviet Russia and the Jesuits:
“In the communist strategy Catholic propaganda was to cause the whole Orthodox structure to crumble . . . The instruments of this new alliance between the Soviets and the Vatican were to be the Jesuits, described as the hereditary enemies of the Orthodox Church. Reportedly, there were, and had been for a considerable time, large numbers of representatives of the Jesuit Order in Moscow [during the revolution] including Bishop [Edward] Ropp. The Pope, [Pius XI] who is said to have left the Jesuit Order before being elected Pope, acted entirely on the instructions of Count Wladimir Ledochowski, the superior general of the Jesuit Order! According to the same report [in maintaining the illusion that the Order was not in full control of the Bolsheviks], the Vatican felt it could bring the Russian [Orthodox] Church under papal domination only if Tikhon [Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church] were eliminated, a condition which the Bolsheviks thought had been fulfilled. The Jesuits and the Vatican, on their part, promised that after a conclusion of a concordat [a Concordat!!!], they would do all in their power to put pressure on the governments of Italy, France, and Belgium to hasten their recognition of the Soviet government [which was done].” {31} [Emphasis added] – Eric Jon Phelps – Vatican Assassins III (p. 792) |
From Sidney Hunter’s Is Alberto for real?, we read on the same subject:
Dr. Rivera is wrong in his claim that Jesuits prepared the Russian Revolution and helped Marx, Engels, Trotsky, Lenin and Stalin bring in Communism in order to destroy the Orthodox Church. |
Answer: We cannot deny that the Russian Revolution was set up by outside interests. No movement of the people on its own will succeed against a modern army without outside help. The old days of Robin Hood, when a few rebels could trouble a properly trained army, are over. |
Today, any rebel force that wants to be successful must have many modern weapons. How to get them is the problem. They cannot manufacture weapons themselves; nor is it possible to capture sufficient quantities of them from the enemy. |
Modern examples of this are Vietnam and Afghanistan. The communists in Vietnam only succeeded because of massive Russian armament shipments into North Vietnam harbors. The anti-communist forces in Afghanistan cannot succeed without limited outside help. |
So it was in 1917. Without outside help, the Communist Revolution would have fizzled out quickly. Wall Street And The Bolshevik Revolution, the well-documented book by Anthony Sutton, shows how money was moved from German and American banks through Swedish banks into Russia for the Bolsheviks’ use. |
Now, the question arises, who were the powers with enough interest in the Communist movement who could send large amounts of money and enough arms to help them to victory? See National Suicide, by A. Sutton, page 76! The general explanation is that the German government wanted to help the Bolsheviks into power so they would end the war. |
Much can be said on this point, but time does not permit. Rivera’s claims as to the secret force behind the Bolshevik movement, which makes more sense than most of the others, are confirmed by Avro Manhattan in his book, The Vatican Billions. On pages 124-125 he writes this: |
|
The reason the deal fell through can be attributed to the cleverness of Lenin, who eventually saw through the real motives of the Vatican. Now, if you care to read carefully the whole chapter of the above mentioned books and Wall Street And The Bolshevik Revolution, you will see a picture emerging which is comfortably close to the claims made by Rivera; that the Jesuits did set up the Russian Revolution. Sydney Hunter – Is Alberto for Real? |